Iceberg Cold & Heat Technology Co., Ltd.
Iceberg Cold & Heat Technology Co., Ltd.
Iceberg Cold & Heat Technology Co., Ltd.
Iceberg Cold & Heat Technology Co., Ltd.

Iceberg Hot and Cold

Harmonious Iceberg, Soaring Dreams


Legal Opinion on the Fourth Extraordinary General Meeting of Shareholders in 2016

Liaoning Huaxia Law Firm
 
Regarding Dalian Refrigeration Co., Ltd.
 
of the Fourth Extraordinary General Meeting of Shareholders in 2016
 
Legal Opinion
 
Liaohua Law Letter [2016] No. 032
 
To: Dalian Refrigeration Co., Ltd.
 
In accordance with the Company Law of the People’s Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as the “Company Law”), the Rules for General Meetings of Listed Companies (hereinafter referred to as the “General Meeting Rules”), the Implementation Rules for Online Voting at General Meetings of Listed Companies of the Shenzhen Stock Exchange (hereinafter referred to as the “Online Voting Rules”), and other relevant laws and regulations, our firm has accepted the engagement of Dalian Refrigeration Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the “Company”) and appointed attorneys Bao Jingxin and Ma Nan to attend the Company’s Fourth Extraordinary General Meeting of 2016, held on December 15, 2016. We have also issued a legal opinion on the legality of such matters as the convening and procedural compliance of the meeting, the qualifications of persons attending the meeting, the qualifications of the convener, as well as the voting procedures and results of the meeting.
 
The attorneys of this firm consent to the Company’s publication of this legal opinion as a statutory document for the current shareholders’ meeting and undertake legal liability for the opinions expressed herein in accordance with the law.
 
In accordance with the industry-recognized standards of practice, ethical norms, and the duty of due diligence expected of lawyers, the attorneys of this firm have reviewed and verified all documents and materials provided by the Company that are relevant to the issuance of this legal opinion. Based on such review and verification, we hereby render the following legal opinion:
 
I. Procedures for Convening and Holding This Shareholders’ Meeting
 
(1) This shareholders’ meeting was convened by the Company’s Board of Directors. The notice of the meeting was published on November 26, 2016, in the China Securities Journal, the Hong Kong Commercial Daily, and the Cninfo website, with the date of publication more than fifteen days prior to the scheduled holding of the meeting. In the notice of the shareholders’ meeting, the Company provided clear instructions regarding the online voting system, the voting time, and the operational procedures.
 
(2) The on-site session of this shareholders’ meeting was chaired by the Chairman of the Company, and the time, venue, and matters to be considered at the meeting were consistent with those specified in the notice of the meeting.
 
The Company has provided a online voting platform for shareholders through the Shenzhen Stock Exchange trading system, with online voting scheduled from 9:30 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. and from 1:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m. on December 15, 2016. In addition, online voting via the Shenzhen Stock Exchange’s Internet Voting System will be available at any time between 3:00 p.m. on December 14, 2016, and 3:00 p.m. on December 15, 2016. The timing and methods for online voting are consistent with the contents of the meeting notice announcement.
 
Upon verification, the attorneys of this firm are of the opinion that the procedures for convening and holding the Company’s current shareholders’ meeting comply with the relevant laws and regulations, including the Company Law, the Securities Law, and the Rules of the Shareholders’ Meeting, as well as the provisions of the Company’s Articles of Association.
 
II. Qualifications of Attendees and the Convenor of This Shareholders’ Meeting
 
(1) Upon verification, the attendance of shareholders and their proxies at this shareholders’ meeting is as follows:
 
1. A total of 10 shareholders and their proxies attended the on-site meeting of this shareholders’ general meeting, representing 184,989,057 shares, or 30.23% of the company’s total voting shares. The attorneys of this firm have verified the identity documents, shareholding certificates, power of attorney letters, the company’s register of shareholders, and other relevant documents and materials submitted by the shareholders and their proxies in attendance, thereby confirming that the aforementioned shareholders and proxies are duly qualified to attend the shareholders’ general meeting.
 
2. According to the statistical results of online voting provided by Shenzhen Stock Exchange Information Network Co., Ltd., a total of 1 shareholder cast a valid vote through the online voting system at this shareholders’ meeting, holding 156,650 shares of the Company, representing 0.03% of the Company’s total number of shares with voting rights.
 
In summary, a total of 11 shareholders and their proxies attended the Company’s current shareholders’ meeting, representing 185,145,707 shares, or 30.26% of the Company’s total voting shares.
 
(2) In addition to the aforementioned shareholders and their proxies, attendees at this shareholders’ meeting also included certain directors, supervisors, senior management personnel of the Company, and attorneys from our firm.
 
The attorneys of this firm are of the opinion that the qualifications of the aforementioned persons attending and observing this shareholders’ meeting comply with the provisions of the Company Law, the Rules for Shareholders’ Meetings, and the Articles of Association.
 
(3) This shareholders’ meeting was convened by the Company’s Board of Directors, and the convener’s qualifications are lawful and valid.
 
III. Voting Procedures for This Shareholders’ Meeting
 
(1) Voting Procedure
 
1. Upon verification by the attorneys of this firm, the matters actually considered at this shareholders’ meeting are consistent with the proposals announced by the Company’s Board of Directors, and no amendments were made to the proposals during the course of the meeting, thereby complying with the relevant provisions of the Company Law, the Rules for Shareholders’ Meetings, and the Company Charter.
 
2. At the on-site meeting of this shareholders’ general meeting, shareholder representatives, supervisory board representatives, and attorneys from our firm were jointly appointed to conduct the vote-counting and vote-monitoring procedures. The vote-monitoring personnel then tallied the voting results, which were subsequently announced by the chairperson of the meeting at the venue. Such procedures are in compliance with applicable laws and regulations as well as the provisions of the Company’s Articles of Association.
 
3. The online voting procedure for this shareholders’ meeting was established in accordance with the provisions of the Detailed Rules on Online Voting. The total number of voting rights exercised through online voting and the corresponding voting results were provided to the Company by Shenzhen Stock Exchange Information Network Co., Ltd., in compliance with applicable laws and regulations.
 
In summary, the attorneys of this firm are of the opinion that the voting procedures for this shareholders’ meeting comply with the relevant provisions of the Company Law, the Rules of the Shareholders’ Meeting, and the Articles of Association.
 
(II) Voting Results
 
At this shareholders’ meeting, the proposal titled “Regarding the Retention of a New Audit Firm for the Company’s 2016 Fiscal Year” was reviewed and approved by vote.
 
The proposal was approved by a majority of the valid voting rights held by the shareholders present at the meeting.
 
Upon verification, the attorneys of this firm are of the opinion that the voting procedures for the Company’s current shareholders’ meeting comply with the provisions of the Company Law, the Rules of the Shareholders’ Meeting, the Detailed Rules on Online Voting, and other applicable laws, regulations, normative documents, as well as the Company’s Articles of Association, and that the results of the vote are lawful and valid.
In summary, the attorneys of this firm are of the opinion that the convening and conduct of the Company’s current shareholders’ meeting comply with the provisions of the Company Law, the Rules for Shareholders’ Meetings, the Detailed Rules on Online Voting, and other applicable laws, regulations, normative documents, as well as the Company’s Articles of Association; that the qualifications of the attendees and the convener of the meeting are lawful and valid; and that the voting procedures and voting results of the meeting are lawful and valid.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Liaoning Huaxia Law Firm
 
 
 
Person in Charge: Jiang Hui
 
 
 
Handling Attorney: Bao Jingxin
 
Horse Male
 
 
 
December 15, 2016
 
 

这里是标题一h1占位文字